AI agents for legal teams, every point quoted, ready for your lawyers' decision.
Hand Duale AI a contract portfolio, a new regulation or an audit. Your lawyers get back one list to act on, each point with its source. One Task splits the work into focused branches and runs in the background.Contract portfolio review, each deviation quoted with its clause
Every signed contract checked against your playbook, with the next renewals first.You hand over: “Review every signed supplier contract against our playbook before the renewal season.”
How the Task splits it: one branch per contract compares it with the playbook in your Library and quotes each clause that departs from it. The branches converge into one portfolio table.
You get back: one row per contract, with the clause quoted, the deviation, a proposed fallback in your own wording and the next renewal date.
Illustrative example: three rows of the portfolio table, for Larkspur IT Services and two other fictional suppliers.
- Contract
- Larkspur IT Services, services agreement
- Clause (quoted)
- § 11.2 “The Supplier’s total liability shall not exceed the fees paid in the three months before the claim.”
- Deviation
- The cap covers three months of fees; your playbook requires at least twelve
- Proposed fallback
- “…shall not exceed the fees paid in the twelve months before the claim.”
- Next renewal
- January 31, 2027
- Contract
- Teal Print, framework agreement
- Clause (quoted)
- § 7 “The Supplier may subcontract any part of the Services without notice.”
- Deviation
- No approval and no notice; your playbook requires your prior written approval
- Proposed fallback
- “The Supplier may subcontract any part of the Services only with the Customer’s prior written approval.”
- Next renewal
- April 30, 2027
- Contract
- Wren Facilities, maintenance agreement
- Clause (quoted)
- § 15.1 “This Agreement renews automatically for successive three-year terms unless terminated with twelve months’ notice.”
- Deviation
- Three-year renewal and twelve months’ notice; your playbook allows one year and three months at most
- Proposed fallback
- “…renews automatically for successive one-year terms unless terminated with three months’ notice.”
- Next renewal
- November 30, 2027
Your lawyers decide: for each contract, whether to renegotiate, accept or escalate.
Regulatory watch, every new text mapped to your policies
Each obligation comes back quoted, with the gap in your policy, a suggested owner and the date it takes effect.When it starts: your code starts one Task for each new text on your topics, or on the schedule you set.
How the Task splits it: branches read the new text through Web research in Tools and compare it with each of your policies in a Library. They also check your earlier notes on the same topic.
You get back: one impact note. Each obligation is quoted with the policy and section it affects, the gap, the date it takes effect and a suggested owner.
Illustrative example: the impact note on a fictional guideline on critical suppliers, published on October 14, 2026.
- Obligation (quoted)
- § 5 “Keep a register of every critical supplier, reviewed at least once a year.”
- Your policy
- Supplier policy, section 2
- Gap
- Your policy keeps no register of critical suppliers
- Takes effect
- April 1, 2027
- Suggested owner
- Head of procurement
- Obligation (quoted)
- § 8 “Name one person accountable for each critical supplier.”
- Your policy
- Supplier policy, section 3
- Gap
- Your policy names a team, not a person
- Takes effect
- April 1, 2027
- Suggested owner
- General counsel
Your team decides: whether to change each policy, and who owns the change.
Compliance gap assessment, every requirement checked before the audit
The gap table gives each requirement a status, its quoted evidence and the next step.You hand over: “Check our policies and evidence against each requirement of the standard we are audited on, before the audit on December 7.”
How the Task splits it: one branch per requirement reads your policies and evidence in your Libraries. The branches converge into one gap table.
You get back: one row per requirement, with the evidence quoted from its document and page, a status (met, partial or missing) and the next step.
Illustrative example: three rows of the gap table, for a fictional standard.
- Requirement (quoted)
- 4.2 “Access rights are reviewed at least once a year.”
- Evidence (quoted)
- Access review procedure, page 3: “Each manager reviews the access rights of their team every January.” Review record dated January 2026
- Status
- Met
- Next step
- —
- Requirement (quoted)
- 6.1 “Suppliers that handle personal data are assessed before onboarding.”
- Evidence (quoted)
- Supplier policy, page 5: “Procurement assesses each new supplier.” No assessment found for two suppliers onboarded in 2026
- Status
- Partial
- Next step
- Assess the two suppliers and file the results
- Requirement (quoted)
- 7.3 “Backups are restored in a test at least once a year.”
- Evidence (quoted)
- No policy or record found
- Status
- Missing
- Next step
- Run a restore test and file its record
Your team decides: which gaps to close first, and what to show the auditor.
The capabilities behind each legal review
Each one is set up once on the Platform and serves your other use cases too.Libraries
Each point quotes the passage and page it rests on. Your playbook, policies, evidence and earlier notes stay in Libraries.
Identity and access
Only your legal team’s agents reach your contracts, each with the access you grant.
Model routing
Your contracts and policies reach only the models your company enabled, at the providers you chose.
Deployment
Keep your contracts and evidence in your own infrastructure.
Before your lawyers hand over their first file
The facts your security, finance and procurement colleagues check.One fixed price per Task
A standard Task costs €0.10 and a fast Task €0.20, excluding VAT, whatever the number of branches or the duration. See pricing
Your providers, your contracts
Your model providers bill you directly for inference.
Your choice of hosting
Use the managed service, hosted in the European Union, or run the Platform in your own infrastructure.
Encrypted storage
All stored data is encrypted, from Library files to database backups.
Unlimited agents
Add agents as your teams and use cases grow.
Your content remains yours
Duale AI does not reuse your content to train a model. See subprocessors
Questions from legal teams
Yes. Every review after the change applies your new positions and fallback wording, on every contract in the portfolio. See how the team that owns a Library keeps it current.
No. Even a French contract is reviewed against your English playbook. See how Libraries work across languages.
Yes. Each review reads the contracts in your tool. See how Tools connect your systems.
Yes. Each impact note reads the official journals and authorities you name, and cites every text it relies on, with its date. See how Web research in Tools cites its sources, or read what sets the scope of the research.
Yes, and its wording too. See how Libraries hold your frameworks and policies.